Caring. Effective. Efficient.

BVA erred by not addressing secondary service connection based on aggravation

BVA erred by not addressing secondary service connection based on aggravation

This case involved a veteran's entitlement to secondary service connection, on an aggravation theory, for degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine. 

The BVA is required to provide a written statement of the reasons or bases for its findings and conclusions on all material issues of fact and law presented on the record; that statement must be adequate to enable a veteran to understand the precise basis for the BVA's decision, as well as to facilitate review in the CAVC. 38 U.S.C. § 7104(d)(1).

The BVA denied secondary service connection on an aggravation theory when it wrote  that the veteran had “acute and transitory back pain in service, and that his current back pain is not causally related to, or aggravated by, active service.”

The BVA failed to discuss, or even mention, the secondary service connection aggravation evidence, which showed the veteran had an abnormal spine examination with flattening of the lumbar spine on his entrance examination and at his Air Controlman Candidate examination. The BVA  clearly failed to provide analysis regarding the issue of secondary service connection based on aggravation.

Moreover, the BVA found a VA C&P Examiner opinion and addendum to be the most probative opinions of record, even though the examiner failed to provide any opinion regarding the issue of secondary service connection based on aggravation in either his opinion or  addendum opinion. The BVA was required, on remand, to consider the adequacy of the exam.

Does this case sound like your VA Rating Decision or BVA Decision? If so, click here to have  Attig | Steel take a look at your case.

Link to the BVA Decision on CAVC Website.

Link to the Joint Motion to Remand the CAVC Website.

Case Details

OGC Attorney: Laura A. Bernasconi

Veteran Representation at CAVC: Chris Attig (link to bio)

Board of Veterans Appeals Veterans Law Judge: Michael Martin

Regional Office: Houston, Texas, VA Regional Office

Vets’ Rep at BVA: Texas Veterans Commission (TVC)

Date of BVA Decision: January 28, 2015

Date of CAVC Judgment on Remand: June 16, 2016

Recent Cases

This case involves the BVA’s dismissal of a veteran’s claim for an earlier effective date for his service-connected post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) based on clear and unmistakeable error. Our client appealed the Board’s decision to th… Read More
The cause number of this appeal, and the veteran’s name, have been withheld to protect the veteran’s privacy. In this case, the BVA denied an increased rating of 70% to a veteran for his service-connected PTSD. The BVA also found the vete… Read More
This case involves a veteran’s appeal to the BVA seeking service connection for arthritis.  The veteran served in the US Air Force from 2005 to 2006. He injured his knee and other parts of his body when required to move heavy appliances into a… Read More

See More Appellate Results

VA Form 21 Blog

Aug
12
“I can’t take a day off or a vacation. Someone has to get the work done.”  If you are a lawyer and that is the reason you are not taking a vacation, or at least a day off, then you are bailing water from a sinking ship. Working to keep… Read More
Aug
9
“To be a good lawyer, one has to be a healthy lawyer.”  So begins an August 2017 report from the National Task Force on Lawyer Well-Being. The problem with this statement, however, is that it is a false comparison. Some of… Read More

Read the VA Form 21 Blog