Caring. Effective. Efficient.

BVA erred by not addressing secondary service connection based on aggravation

BVA erred by not addressing secondary service connection based on aggravation

This case involved a veteran's entitlement to secondary service connection, on an aggravation theory, for degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine. 

The BVA is required to provide a written statement of the reasons or bases for its findings and conclusions on all material issues of fact and law presented on the record; that statement must be adequate to enable a veteran to understand the precise basis for the BVA's decision, as well as to facilitate review in the CAVC. 38 U.S.C. § 7104(d)(1).

The BVA denied secondary service connection on an aggravation theory when it wrote  that the veteran had “acute and transitory back pain in service, and that his current back pain is not causally related to, or aggravated by, active service.”

The BVA failed to discuss, or even mention, the secondary service connection aggravation evidence, which showed the veteran had an abnormal spine examination with flattening of the lumbar spine on his entrance examination and at his Air Controlman Candidate examination. The BVA  clearly failed to provide analysis regarding the issue of secondary service connection based on aggravation.

Moreover, the BVA found a VA C&P Examiner opinion and addendum to be the most probative opinions of record, even though the examiner failed to provide any opinion regarding the issue of secondary service connection based on aggravation in either his opinion or  addendum opinion. The BVA was required, on remand, to consider the adequacy of the exam.

Does this case sound like your VA Rating Decision or BVA Decision? If so, click here to have  Attig | Steel take a look at your case.

Link to the BVA Decision on CAVC Website.

Link to the Joint Motion to Remand the CAVC Website.

Case Details

OGC Attorney: Laura A. Bernasconi

Veteran Representation at CAVC: Chris Attig (link to bio)

Board of Veterans Appeals Veterans Law Judge: Michael Martin

Regional Office: Houston, Texas, VA Regional Office

Vets’ Rep at BVA: Texas Veterans Commission (TVC)

Date of BVA Decision: January 28, 2015

Date of CAVC Judgment on Remand: June 16, 2016

Recent Cases

This case involves the Board’s failure to reopen a veteran’s claim for service connection despite admitting that he submitted new and material evidence.  Our client appealed the BVA’s decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (… Read More
When the BVA failed to consider all the evidence of record before finding a veteran was not exposed to asbestos in military service, the law firm of Attig | Steel was able to get the BVA decision vacated at the US Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims… Read More
This case involves the BVA’s dismissal of a veteran’s claim for an earlier effective date for his service-connected post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) based on clear and unmistakeable error. Our client appealed the Board’s decision to th… Read More

See More Appellate Results

VA Form 21 Blog

Sep
30
Earlier this year, I tested an idea – what if a group of lawyers grabbed a virtual cup of coffee every Monday morning and chatted about their progress building a profitable law firm that prioritizes the attorney’s well being? Thos… Read More
Sep
6
If you hear the phrase, lawyers with a purpose, what is your immediate reaction? Do you roll your eyes? Yawn? Close this page and find something else to read? I’ll be honest, the first time a business coach told me that my law practice… Read More

Read the VA Form 21 Blog