Caring. Effective. Efficient.

BVA failed to consider PTSD Rating greater than 50%

BVA failed to consider PTSD Rating greater than 50%

"Symptom hunting"  is a common BVA error in a PTSD rating appeal, and we believed the BVA engaged in this practice when it denied our client anything more than a 50 percent PTSD rating. 

Here's how it happens: using the  list of examples of rateable symptoms in the VA's mental health diagnostic code, the BVA judge hunts through the record for those exact symptoms.

The problem with this approach is that assigning a PTSD rating is not a mechanical exercise - the BVA judge is required to conduct a "holistic analysis" of the Veteran's condition before assigning a rating. This requires evaluating - and comparing - the PTSD symptoms the veteran does have, and comparing their frequency, chronicity and severity to the VA's rating criteria for PTSD. 

In this case, the BVA judge hunted for symptoms to support a 50 percent PTSD rating, and to deny TDIU. 

After an extensive record review, and detailing the symptoms the veteran had which were not considered when the BVA judge assigned the 50 percent PTSD rating, the parties agreed to vacate the BVA decision and send it back through a Joint Motion to Remand.

Does this case sound like your VA Rating Decision or BVA Decision? If so, click here to have  Attig | Steel take a look at your case.

Link to the BVA Decision on CAVC Website.

Link to the Joint Motion to Remand the CAVC Website.

Case Details

OGC Attorney: Shereen M. Marcus

Veteran Representation at CAVC: Chris Attig (link to bio)

Board of Veterans Appeals Veterans Law Judge: Derek R. Brown

Regional Office: Montgomery, Alabama VARO

Vets’ Rep at BVA:  Adam Werner

Date of BVA Decision: March 15, 2016

Date of CAVC Judgment on Remand: January 21, 2017

Recent Cases

(April 18, 2018) The law firm of Hill and Ponton approached Attig | Steel after the BVA judge denied their veteran a higher 70 percent PTSD rating. They had put a lot of work and energy into helping a veteran, and the BVA decision seemed to gloss ove… Read More
(April 6, 2018) The veteran in this case served in the Navy in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom, including deployment to Kuwait. Upon his return stateside, after attempts to reintegrate to civilian life, he began to have family and other problems.… Read More
(February 14, 2018) Attorney Chris Attig has been working with this veteran’s survivor for half a decade to get her DIC and survivor’s accrued benefits properly awarded.  The veteran was a 3 decade military veteran, who fought not only i… Read More

See More Appellate Results

VA Form 21 Blog

Nov
26
Today’s video starts off with an overview of a recent precedential decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in the case of Moody v. Wilkie, Cause No. 16-1707. Click here to read the CAVC’s panel decision in Moody v. Wi… Read More
Nov
15
What is the Deep Issue in the Case? 38 U.S.C. §7107(b) (2012) requires “[t]he Board shall decide any appeal only after affording the appellant an opportunity for a hearing.”  On remand from the Veterans Court, the veteran asked for a new BVA he… Read More

Read the VA Form 21 Blog