Caring. Effective. Efficient.

BVA Mischaracterized Appeal as Claim to Reopen

BVA Mischaracterized Appeal as Claim to Reopen

The BVA decision in this case mischaracterized the veteran's traditional appeal as a claim to reopen.  The BVA Judge  found that the veteran's  service connection claim for his left ankle disorder and bilateral pes planus were not reopened because new and material evidence had not been received to reopen the claims.

The problem with the decision was that the procedural posture of the case had nothing to do with reopened claims. This case is an example of a common problem with the BVA - they simply don't look at the claim to understand its procedural posture.  Here's the actual procedural posture of the veteran's claim:

July 2013: VA Rating Decision denying bilateral pes planus and left ankle condition claims.

December 3, 2013: Veteran disagrees with the VA Rating Decision and asks for an immediate appeal due to financial hardship.

July 2014: VA Rating Decision confirmed and continued the denial, but decided to call the claims "reconsideration claims", whatever that is (no such procedure or nomenclature exists in the VA appeals process).

September 2014: Veteran filed a Notice of Disagreement to the July 2014 VA Rating Decision

VA certified the appeal to the BVA, and BVA Remanded to issue a Statement of Case (SOC)

September 2015: SOC was issued, but did not characterize the claim as a claim to reopen

February 2016: BVA denies "claim to reopen" on grounds that there was not new and material evidence to reopen the claim.

The remand order in this case directs the BVA to readjudicate the appeal as what it is - an appeal of a July 2013 VA Ratings Decision - rather than what the BVA pretended it is (a claim to reopen).

Does this case sound like your VA Rating Decision or BVA Decision? If so, click here to have  Attig | Steel take a look at your case.

Link to the BVA Decision on CAVC Website.

Link to the Joint Motion to Remand the CAVC Website.

Case Details

OGC Attorney: Abigail J. Schopick

Veteran Representation at CAVC: Chris Attig (link to bio)

Board of Veterans Appeals Veterans Law Judge: S.L. Kennedy

Regional Office: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania VA Regional Office

Vets’ Rep at BVA: American Legion 

Date of BVA Decision: May 6, 2016

Date of CAVC Judgment on Remand: February 24, 2017

Recent Cases

This case involves a veteran’s appeal to the BVA seeking service connection for arthritis.  The veteran served in the US Air Force from 2005 to 2006. He injured his knee and other parts of his body when required to move heavy appliances into a… Read More
Attorney Chris Attig has been working with this veteran’s survivor for half a decade to get her DIC and survivor’s accrued benefits properly awarded.  The veteran was a 3 decade military veteran, who fought not only in Thailand during th… Read More
  This case involves the BVA’s rating of a veteran’s service connected knee injury and a BVA credibility finding; our client appealed the BVA’s decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claim (CAVC). The appeal was res… Read More

See More Appellate Results

VA Form 21 Blog

Apr
23
What is the Deep Issue in the Case? Claimants eligible to receive accrued benefits upon the veteran’s death are, in order of eligibility, the veteran’s spouse, “the veteran’s children” and the veteran’s depende… Read More
Jan
17
One of our clients’ cases, Martinez v. Wilkie, No 17-1551, was recently set for a panel decision by the US Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC).We are not yet sure if there will be supplemental briefing or oral argument at this time. I… Read More

Read the VA Form 21 Blog