Caring. Effective. Efficient.

BVA Mischaracterized Appeal as Claim to Reopen

BVA Mischaracterized Appeal as Claim to Reopen

The BVA decision in this case mischaracterized the veteran's traditional appeal as a claim to reopen.  The BVA Judge  found that the veteran's  service connection claim for his left ankle disorder and bilateral pes planus were not reopened because new and material evidence had not been received to reopen the claims.

The problem with the decision was that the procedural posture of the case had nothing to do with reopened claims. This case is an example of a common problem with the BVA - they simply don't look at the claim to understand its procedural posture.  Here's the actual procedural posture of the veteran's claim:

July 2013: VA Rating Decision denying bilateral pes planus and left ankle condition claims.

December 3, 2013: Veteran disagrees with the VA Rating Decision and asks for an immediate appeal due to financial hardship.

July 2014: VA Rating Decision confirmed and continued the denial, but decided to call the claims "reconsideration claims", whatever that is (no such procedure or nomenclature exists in the VA appeals process).

September 2014: Veteran filed a Notice of Disagreement to the July 2014 VA Rating Decision

VA certified the appeal to the BVA, and BVA Remanded to issue a Statement of Case (SOC)

September 2015: SOC was issued, but did not characterize the claim as a claim to reopen

February 2016: BVA denies "claim to reopen" on grounds that there was not new and material evidence to reopen the claim.

The remand order in this case directs the BVA to readjudicate the appeal as what it is - an appeal of a July 2013 VA Ratings Decision - rather than what the BVA pretended it is (a claim to reopen).

Does this case sound like your VA Rating Decision or BVA Decision? If so, click here to have  Attig | Steel take a look at your case.

Link to the BVA Decision on CAVC Website.

Link to the Joint Motion to Remand the CAVC Website.

Case Details

OGC Attorney: Abigail J. Schopick

Veteran Representation at CAVC: Chris Attig (link to bio)

Board of Veterans Appeals Veterans Law Judge: S.L. Kennedy

Regional Office: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania VA Regional Office

Vets’ Rep at BVA: American Legion 

Date of BVA Decision: May 6, 2016

Date of CAVC Judgment on Remand: February 24, 2017

Recent Cases

This case involves the Board’s failure to reopen a veteran’s claim for service connection despite admitting that he submitted new and material evidence.  Our client appealed the BVA’s decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (… Read More
When the BVA failed to consider all the evidence of record before finding a veteran was not exposed to asbestos in military service, the law firm of Attig | Steel was able to get the BVA decision vacated at the US Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims… Read More
This case involves the BVA’s dismissal of a veteran’s claim for an earlier effective date for his service-connected post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) based on clear and unmistakeable error. Our client appealed the Board’s decision to th… Read More

See More Appellate Results

VA Form 21 Blog

Sep
30
Earlier this year, I tested an idea – what if a group of lawyers grabbed a virtual cup of coffee every Monday morning and chatted about their progress building a profitable law firm that prioritizes the attorney’s well being? Thos… Read More
Sep
6
If you hear the phrase, lawyers with a purpose, what is your immediate reaction? Do you roll your eyes? Yawn? Close this page and find something else to read? I’ll be honest, the first time a business coach told me that my law practice… Read More

Read the VA Form 21 Blog