Caring. Effective. Efficient.

BVA errs in rating Central Sleep Apnea

BVA errs in rating Central Sleep Apnea

Th veteran sought a higher rating for several service-connected disabilities, including central sleep apnea (CSA), chronic bronchitis, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and allergic bronchospasms. The Board assigned a rating of 50% and no higher for all of the conditions combined.

In doing so, the BVA made three primary - and common - errors.

First, the BVA cannot invoke the rule in 38 C.F.R. §4.96a against the pyramiding of respiratory conditions unless all the conditions are respiratory in nature. Central Sleep Apnea, while it manifests in symptoms affecting the sleep breathing functions of the body, is not a respiratory condition. It is a neurological condition, and therefore in the opinion of this firm, is not subject to the rule against pyramiding ratings of respiratory conditions under 38 C.F.R. §4.96a.  

Second, if the BVA is going to invoke the rule in 38 CFR 4.96a against the pyramiding of respiratory conditions, it must explain which of the respiratory conditions predominates, and use that as a basis. 

Third, in any case where a veteran has sought an increased rating, and there are symptoms of a condition not envisioned by the schedular disability compensation ratings tables, the BVA has a duty to consider whether an extra-schedular rating is appropriate

The BVA denied this veteran separate ratings for Sleep Apnea and COPD. 

On remand, the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims made it clear the BVA failed to explain which of the 2 conditions was predominant for rating purposes. Because the veteran's central sleep apnea is a neurologic condition, the BVA also failed to consider what diagnostic code should be assigned to rate his sleep apnea.

Does this case sound like your VA Rating Decision or BVA Decision? If so, click here to have  Attig | Steel take a look at your case.

Link to the BVA Decision on CAVC Website.

Link to the Joint Motion to Remand the CAVC Website.

Case Details

OGC Attorney: Abigail J. Schopick

Veteran Representation at CAVC: Chris Attig (link to bio)

Board of Veterans Appeals Veterans Law Judge: Deborah W. Singleton

Regional Office: Boise, Idaho

Vets’ Rep at BVA: American Legion 

Date of BVA Decision: January 29, 2016

Date of CAVC Judgment on Remand

Recent Cases

(April 18, 2018) The law firm of Hill and Ponton approached Attig | Steel after the BVA judge denied their veteran a higher 70 percent PTSD rating. They had put a lot of work and energy into helping a veteran, and the BVA decision seemed to gloss ove… Read More
(April 6, 2018) The veteran in this case served in the Navy in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom, including deployment to Kuwait. Upon his return stateside, after attempts to reintegrate to civilian life, he began to have family and other problems.… Read More
(February 14, 2018) Attorney Chris Attig has been working with this veteran’s survivor for half a decade to get her DIC and survivor’s accrued benefits properly awarded.  The veteran was a 3 decade military veteran, who fought not only i… Read More

See More Appellate Results

VA Form 21 Blog

Nov
26
Today’s video starts off with an overview of a recent precedential decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in the case of Moody v. Wilkie, Cause No. 16-1707. Click here to read the CAVC’s panel decision in Moody v. Wi… Read More
Nov
15
What is the Deep Issue in the Case? 38 U.S.C. §7107(b) (2012) requires “[t]he Board shall decide any appeal only after affording the appellant an opportunity for a hearing.”  On remand from the Veterans Court, the veteran asked for a new BVA he… Read More

Read the VA Form 21 Blog