Caring. Effective. Efficient.

BVA errs in relying on 7 year old IBS exam

BVA errs in relying on 7 year old IBS exam

This case had multiple errors in it.  One of the major errors was the BVA treatment of the client's Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS).

The Veteran initially had an exam in 2009 to rate his service-connectedIrritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS).  By the time this appeal found its way to the BVA Veterans Law Judge's desk for a decision, 7 years had passed (the BVAdecision was issued in February 2016).

The question became whether a 7 year old medical exam rating Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) was relevant to rating the veteran in 2016.

Typically, the VA OGC does not like to remand BVA decisions that rely on exams - no matter how old - unless the veteran alleges a worsening of symptoms, in this case, worsening of his Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS).

They frequently rely on a particular case to find that the mere passage of time does not justify a new exam.  Palczewski v. Nicholson, 21 Vet.App. 174, 182-83 (2007).  However, when a veteran tells the VA and BVA that his condition is worsening, that old exam suddenly needs updating.

The Palczewski  decision  is ripe for a challenge, Attig | Steel would be willing to review your BVA decision, if you have an appealable BVA decision in which the BVA relied on a 3-5+ year old exam to rate your condition . 

In this case, the Veteran's VA treatment records for Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) show had several worsening symptoms (including  diarrhea and constipation) multiple times per week. He stated his Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) symptoms were “frequent, persistent, and a major source of agony . . . [that] affects his daily living.”  

On this, and other errors, we were able to secure a remand which vacated the BVA decision and sent it back to the BVA and/or Houston VA Regional Office for a new C&P rating exam for the veteran's Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS).

Does this case sound like your VA Rating Decision or BVA Decision? If so, click here to have  Attig | Steel take a look at your case.

Link to the BVA Decision on CAVC Website.

Link to the Joint Motion to Remand the CAVC Website.

Case Details

OGC Attorney: Abigail J. Schopick

Veteran Representation at CAVC: Chris Attig (link to bio)

Board of Veterans Appeals Veterans Law Judge: J. Parker

Regional Office: Houston, Texas VARO

Vets’ Rep at BVA:  DAV

Date of BVA Decision: February 18, 2016

Date of CAVC Judgment on Remand: December 13, 2016

Recent Cases

(April 18, 2018) The law firm of Hill and Ponton approached Attig | Steel after the BVA judge denied their veteran a higher 70 percent PTSD rating. They had put a lot of work and energy into helping a veteran, and the BVA decision seemed to gloss ove… Read More
(April 6, 2018) The veteran in this case served in the Navy in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom, including deployment to Kuwait. Upon his return stateside, after attempts to reintegrate to civilian life, he began to have family and other problems.… Read More
(February 14, 2018) Attorney Chris Attig has been working with this veteran’s survivor for half a decade to get her DIC and survivor’s accrued benefits properly awarded.  The veteran was a 3 decade military veteran, who fought not only i… Read More

See More Appellate Results

VA Form 21 Blog

Nov
26
Today’s video starts off with an overview of a recent precedential decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in the case of Moody v. Wilkie, Cause No. 16-1707. Click here to read the CAVC’s panel decision in Moody v. Wi… Read More
Nov
15
What is the Deep Issue in the Case? 38 U.S.C. §7107(b) (2012) requires “[t]he Board shall decide any appeal only after affording the appellant an opportunity for a hearing.”  On remand from the Veterans Court, the veteran asked for a new BVA he… Read More

Read the VA Form 21 Blog