Caring. Effective. Efficient.

BVA errs in relying on 7 year old IBS exam

BVA errs in relying on 7 year old IBS exam

This case had multiple errors in it.  One of the major errors was the BVA treatment of the client's Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS).

The Veteran initially had an exam in 2009 to rate his service-connectedIrritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS).  By the time this appeal found its way to the BVA Veterans Law Judge's desk for a decision, 7 years had passed (the BVAdecision was issued in February 2016).

The question became whether a 7 year old medical exam rating Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) was relevant to rating the veteran in 2016.

Typically, the VA OGC does not like to remand BVA decisions that rely on exams - no matter how old - unless the veteran alleges a worsening of symptoms, in this case, worsening of his Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS).

They frequently rely on a particular case to find that the mere passage of time does not justify a new exam.  Palczewski v. Nicholson, 21 Vet.App. 174, 182-83 (2007).  However, when a veteran tells the VA and BVA that his condition is worsening, that old exam suddenly needs updating.

The Palczewski  decision  is ripe for a challenge, Attig | Steel would be willing to review your BVA decision, if you have an appealable BVA decision in which the BVA relied on a 3-5+ year old exam to rate your condition . 

In this case, the Veteran's VA treatment records for Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) show had several worsening symptoms (including  diarrhea and constipation) multiple times per week. He stated his Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) symptoms were “frequent, persistent, and a major source of agony . . . [that] affects his daily living.”  

On this, and other errors, we were able to secure a remand which vacated the BVA decision and sent it back to the BVA and/or Houston VA Regional Office for a new C&P rating exam for the veteran's Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS).

Does this case sound like your VA Rating Decision or BVA Decision? If so, click here to have  Attig | Steel take a look at your case.

Link to the BVA Decision on CAVC Website.

Link to the Joint Motion to Remand the CAVC Website.

Case Details

OGC Attorney: Abigail J. Schopick

Veteran Representation at CAVC: Chris Attig (link to bio)

Board of Veterans Appeals Veterans Law Judge: J. Parker

Regional Office: Houston, Texas VARO

Vets’ Rep at BVA:  DAV

Date of BVA Decision: February 18, 2016

Date of CAVC Judgment on Remand: December 13, 2016

Recent Cases

This case involves the Board’s failure to reopen a veteran’s claim for service connection despite admitting that he submitted new and material evidence.  Our client appealed the BVA’s decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (… Read More
When the BVA failed to consider all the evidence of record before finding a veteran was not exposed to asbestos in military service, the law firm of Attig | Steel was able to get the BVA decision vacated at the US Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims… Read More
This case involves the BVA’s dismissal of a veteran’s claim for an earlier effective date for his service-connected post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) based on clear and unmistakeable error. Our client appealed the Board’s decision to th… Read More

See More Appellate Results

VA Form 21 Blog

Sep
30
Earlier this year, I tested an idea – what if a group of lawyers grabbed a virtual cup of coffee every Monday morning and chatted about their progress building a profitable law firm that prioritizes the attorney’s well being? Thos… Read More
Sep
6
If you hear the phrase, lawyers with a purpose, what is your immediate reaction? Do you roll your eyes? Yawn? Close this page and find something else to read? I’ll be honest, the first time a business coach told me that my law practice… Read More

Read the VA Form 21 Blog