Caring. Effective. Efficient.

BVA fails to consider Survivor's Claim of Substitution

BVA fails to consider Survivor's Claim of Substitution

This case involves a survivor's claim of substitution into a veteran's pending claims and appeals when the veteran passes away.

At the time the BVA Veterans Law Judge issued the decision, the law required that a VA Form 21-534 for Survivor benefits will be accepted as both a claim for accrued benefits and a VA claim of substitution form.  38 C.F.R. 3.1010. Additionally, before the BVA issued its decision in this case, the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims issued a precedential decision finding that a VA claim for accrued benefits was also a survivor's VA claim of substitution. Reliford v. McDonald, 27 Vet.App. 297 (2015).  

The BVA ignored the law and failed to consider the survivors VA claim of substitution into pending claims and appeals.

Because the law was so clear, the VA Office of General Counsel agreed to jointly move to vacate the BVA decision for its failure to follow the law and failure to consider whether the surviving spouse's application for VA survivor benefits was also a VA claim of substitution into the veteran's pending claims and appeals.

Does this case sound like your VA Rating Decision or BVA Decision? If so, click here to have  Attig | Steel take a look at your case.

Link to the BVA Decision on CAVC Website.

Link to the Joint Motion to Remand the CAVC Website.

Case Details

OGC Attorney: Yvette R. White

Veteran Representation at CAVC: Chris Attig (link to bio)

Board of Veterans Appeals Veterans Law Judge: Barbara B. Copeland

Regional Office: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, VA Regional Office

Vets’ Rep at BVA: Chris Attig (link to BVA Appeals information)

Date of BVA Decision: March 25, 2015

Date of CAVC Judgment on Remand: November 25, 2015

Recent Cases

(April 18, 2018) The law firm of Hill and Ponton approached Attig | Steel after the BVA judge denied their veteran a higher 70 percent PTSD rating. They had put a lot of work and energy into helping a veteran, and the BVA decision seemed to gloss ove… Read More
(April 6, 2018) The veteran in this case served in the Navy in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom, including deployment to Kuwait. Upon his return stateside, after attempts to reintegrate to civilian life, he began to have family and other problems.… Read More
(February 14, 2018) Attorney Chris Attig has been working with this veteran’s survivor for half a decade to get her DIC and survivor’s accrued benefits properly awarded.  The veteran was a 3 decade military veteran, who fought not only i… Read More

See More Appellate Results

VA Form 21 Blog

Nov
26
Today’s video starts off with an overview of a recent precedential decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in the case of Moody v. Wilkie, Cause No. 16-1707. Click here to read the CAVC’s panel decision in Moody v. Wi… Read More
Nov
15
What is the Deep Issue in the Case? 38 U.S.C. §7107(b) (2012) requires “[t]he Board shall decide any appeal only after affording the appellant an opportunity for a hearing.”  On remand from the Veterans Court, the veteran asked for a new BVA he… Read More

Read the VA Form 21 Blog