Caring. Effective. Efficient.

BVA Erred in Denying Service Connection for Sleep Apnea

BVA Erred in Denying Service Connection for Sleep Apnea

The BVA denied a veteran service connection for  sleep apnea, and made several errors in doing so.

First, it failed to consider the nexus between the veteran's deviated septum treatment in service and his sleep apnea.

Second, the BVA Veterans Law Judge considered, without any explanation, routine lay statements of symptoms of sleep apnea as "not credible". The VA agreed that the BVA judge erred when he rejected  a  veteran's statements describing in-service sleep deprivation and continuity of symptomatology for his sleep apnea as “not credible” on the grounds that service treatment records were silent for such complaints. 

BVA Judges routinely find veterans "not credible" - and their findings rarely have support in the fact or law.  Please contact Attig | Steel if you have a BVA decision which based its denial on an allegation that your veteran client  lacked credibility.

The Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims vacated this BVA decision denying service connection for sleep apnea and remanded it with instructions to follow in readjudicating the case.

Attig | Steel coordinated with the law firm of Gordon & Doner to handle the veteran's remand to the BVA.

Link to the BVA Decision on CAVC Website.

Link to the Joint Motion to Remand the CAVC Website.

Case Details

OGC Attorney: Shereen Marcus

Veteran Representation at CAVC: Chris Attig (link to bio)

Board of Veterans Appeals Veterans Law Judge:Harvey P. Roberts

Regional Office: Los Angeles, California VARO

Vets’ Rep at BVA: Adam G. Werner

Date of BVA Decision: September 12, 2016

Date of CAVC Remand Order: June 15, 2017

Recent Cases

(April 18, 2018) The law firm of Hill and Ponton approached Attig | Steel after the BVA judge denied their veteran a higher 70 percent PTSD rating. They had put a lot of work and energy into helping a veteran, and the BVA decision seemed to gloss ove… Read More
(April 6, 2018) The veteran in this case served in the Navy in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom, including deployment to Kuwait. Upon his return stateside, after attempts to reintegrate to civilian life, he began to have family and other problems.… Read More
(February 14, 2018) Attorney Chris Attig has been working with this veteran’s survivor for half a decade to get her DIC and survivor’s accrued benefits properly awarded.  The veteran was a 3 decade military veteran, who fought not only i… Read More

See More Appellate Results

VA Form 21 Blog

Nov
26
Today’s video starts off with an overview of a recent precedential decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in the case of Moody v. Wilkie, Cause No. 16-1707. Click here to read the CAVC’s panel decision in Moody v. Wi… Read More
Nov
15
What is the Deep Issue in the Case? 38 U.S.C. §7107(b) (2012) requires “[t]he Board shall decide any appeal only after affording the appellant an opportunity for a hearing.”  On remand from the Veterans Court, the veteran asked for a new BVA he… Read More

Read the VA Form 21 Blog